Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.

24 Mont. 242

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 1900

DocketNo. 1,364; No. 1,411; No. 1,501

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 Mont. 242 (Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co., 24 Mont. 242 (Mo. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The respondents in each of these cases move a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the un[243]*243dertaking in each is void for ambiguity. The appeals are from judgments and orders refusing new trials. Each undertaking is in form and substance like the undertaking considered in Watkins v. Morris, 14 Mont. 354, 36 Pac. 452, and Ramsey, v. Burns, 24 Mont. 234, 61 Pac. Rep. 129. Upon the authority of Watkins v. Morris, and Ramsey v. Burns, supra, the motions must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— The respondents in each of these cases move a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the un[243]*243dertaking in each is void for ambiguity. The appeals are from judgments and orders refusing new trials. Each undertaking is in form and substance like the undertaking considered in Watkins v. Morris, 14 Mont. 354, 36 Pac. 452, and Ramsey, v. Burns, 24 Mont. 234, 61 Pac. Rep. 129. Upon the authority of Watkins v. Morris, and Ramsey v. Burns, supra, the motions must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Mont. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-butte-hardware-co-mont-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack