Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.

24 Mont. 242

Montana Supreme Court·Decided June 7, 1900·No. No. 1,364; No. 1,411; No. 1,501·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The respondents in each of these cases move a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the un[243] dertaking in each is void for ambiguity. The appeals are from judgments and orders refusing new trials. Each undertaking is in form and substance like the undertaking considered in Watkins v. Morris, 14 Mont. 354, 36 Pac. 452, and Ramsey, v. Burns, 24 Mont. 234, 61 Pac. Rep. 129. Upon the authority of Watkins v. Morris, and Ramsey v. Burns, supra, the motions must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— The respondents in each of these cases move a dismissal of the appeals upon the ground that the un[243] dertaking in each is void for ambiguity. The appeals are from judgments and orders refusing new trials. Each undertaking is in form and substance like the undertaking considered in Watkins v. Morris, 14 Mont. 354, 36 Pac. 452, and Ramsey, v. Burns, 24 Mont. 234, 61 Pac. Rep. 129. Upon the authority of Watkins v. Morris, and Ramsey v. Burns, supra, the motions must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Denied.

Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co., 24 Mont. 242 (Mo. 1900).

Pincite

24 Mont. 242 (Mahoney v. Butte Hardware Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related