Mahoney v. Alviso

California Supreme Court

Mahoney v. Alviso

51 Cal. 440, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 76

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1876

DocketNo. 4781

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 440 (Mahoney v. Alviso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahoney v. Alviso, 51 Cal. 440, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 76 (Cal. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

It should have been stated in the complaint, if such were the fact, that the rents in controversy accrued subsequently [442]*442to the entry of the decree in partition, for it is upon this proposition, in the main, that the right of the plaintiffs to those rents would rest. There is no such averment found in the complaint in direct terms; nor do its allegations, fairly construed, amount to such an averment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

It should have been stated in the complaint, if such were the fact, that the rents in controversy accrued subsequently [442]*442to the entry of the decree in partition, for it is upon this proposition, in the main, that the right of the plaintiffs to those rents would rest. There is no such averment found in the complaint in direct terms; nor do its allegations, fairly construed, amount to such an averment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cal. 440, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-alviso-cal-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack