Mahone v. Perkinson
35 Ga. 207
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons that the judgment was incorrectly entered np, Code, sec. 3241; and the Court had the power, and it was his duty, to amend the judgment and execution, so as to make them conform to the legal effect of the verdict: Sections 3424-5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahone v. Perkinson, 35 Ga. 207 (Ga. 1866).
35 Ga. 207 (Mahone v. Perkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Department of Transportation v. Great Southern Enterprises, Inc.
225 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
NORTON REALTY & LOAN COMPANY, INC. v. Bd. of Ed. of Hall County
200 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Darley v. Darley
51 S.E.2d 846 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Brown v. Cole
28 S.E.2d 76 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Collins v. Southern Finance Corp.
180 S.E. 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Scarborough v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
62 S.E. 1040 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Latimer v. Sweat
54 S.E. 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Kimball v. Nicol & Davidson
58 Ga. 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)