Mahone v. Perkinson
35 Ga. 207
This text of 35 Ga. 207 (Mahone v. Perkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mahone v. Perkinson, 35 Ga. 207 (Ga. 1866).
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons that the judgment was incorrectly entered np, Code, sec. 3241; and the Court had the power, and it was his duty, to amend the judgment and execution, so as to make them conform to the legal effect of the verdict: Sections 3424-5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Department of Transportation v. Great Southern Enterprises, Inc.
225 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
NORTON REALTY & LOAN COMPANY, INC. v. Bd. of Ed. of Hall County
200 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Darley v. Darley
51 S.E.2d 846 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Brown v. Cole
28 S.E.2d 76 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Collins v. Southern Finance Corp.
180 S.E. 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Scarborough v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
62 S.E. 1040 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Latimer v. Sweat
54 S.E. 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Kimball v. Nicol & Davidson
58 Ga. 175 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Ga. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahone-v-perkinson-ga-1866.