Mahone v. MARSHALL FURNITURE COMPANY

235 S.E.2d 672, 142 Ga. App. 242, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1560
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1977
Docket53665
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 235 S.E.2d 672 (Mahone v. MARSHALL FURNITURE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahone v. MARSHALL FURNITURE COMPANY, 235 S.E.2d 672, 142 Ga. App. 242, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1560 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this suit on open account the summons and complaint were served by leaving a copy at defendant’s apartment with a Mary Lue Hankerson. Defendant failed to file a timely answer and a judgment by default was entered. Thereafter defendant filed a motion to set aside the judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. In a supporting affidavit defendant averred that Miss Hankerson was the babysitter for defendant’s *243 three minor children and a nonresident of her household. The trial court in denying the motion recited that the babysitter testified at the hearing that she placed the summons and complaint on defendant’s dresser and notified defendant of that fact on the day of service. Held:

Submitted April 4, 1977 Decided May 9, 1977. Willie Abrams, for appellant. J. Alton Gladin, for appellee.

Section 4(d)(7) of the Georgia Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-104 (d) (7)) requires, in pertinent part, that the person with whom the copy of the summons and complaint is left at the defendant’s dwelling or usual place of abode be "of suitable age and discretion then residing therein.” As it was uncontradicted that the babysitter was not residing with defendant, there was a failure to obtain lawful service. In the absence of lawful service or waiver, the court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant and the judgment was void. Thompson v. Lagerquist, 232 Ga. 75, 76 (205 SE2d 267). The fact that defendant acquired knowledge of the pending suit does not cure the defective service. Hardwick v. Fry, 137 Ga. App. 771 (224 SE2d 88).

Judgment reversed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guerrero v. Guerrero
768 S.E.2d 451 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Scanlan v. Townsend
Washington Supreme Court, 2014
O'SELL v. Peterson
595 N.W.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1999)
Burtchaell v. Hoffman
508 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Brim v. Pruitt
342 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Villaruz v. Van Diviere Oil Co.
304 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Cook v. Bright
258 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
McGowan v. Badcock Corp.
240 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Morgan v. PACIFIC FINANCE COMPANY
236 S.E.2d 28 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 S.E.2d 672, 142 Ga. App. 242, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahone-v-marshall-furniture-company-gactapp-1977.