Mahone v. Grimshaw
This text of 20 Cal. 175 (Mahone v. Grimshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the cattle, for the possession of which the action is brought, were, as contended by the defendant, the separate property of the wife of the plaintiff, that fact constitutes no defense. The husband, by the express language of the statute, is entitled to the management and control of the separate property of the wife during the continuance of the marriage, and, of course, to its possession. If the wife have any just cause to apprehend that her husband will mismanage or waste her separate property, she has her remedy by application to the District Court for the appointment of a trustee to take charge of and manage the same. (Act defining the Rights of Husband and Wife, of April 17th, 1850, secs. 6 and 8.)
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Cal. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahone-v-grimshaw-cal-1862.