IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, vs. FP ED EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A NOV 0 9 2020 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A. P.:1:".rfiN DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY COIF"
BUYERS, LLC, i-nr CLci Res s ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge. On July 10, 2020, this court entered an order striking the opening brief. This court directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that was signed by both appellants, complied with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contained a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. Appellants were cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal. On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, the clerk of this court issued a notice rejecting that brief because it did not comply with this court's rules.2 The notice directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit their opening brief within 5 days.
IA copy of this order is attached.
2A copy of this notice is attached. Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, on August 25, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, by September 1, 2020, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32.3 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Thus, on September 17, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, within 7 days, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32.4 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. To date, appellants have not resubmitted an opening brief or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellants have abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Stiglich Silver
3A copy of this order is attached.
4A copy of this order is attached. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A <1414. 2 cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/KJA No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, V S. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A FILED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, JUL I 0 2E1 DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY ELIZABETH A. BROWN BUYERS, LLC, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SY S Res ondent. Cr= DEPUT l lt
ORDER STRIKING OPENING BRIEF
Appellant Margaret Mary Mahon filed an opening brief on June 2, 2020, purportedly on behalf of herself and appellant Christopher Lund. The brief does not comply with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32 and is not signed by Ms. Mahon, see NRAP 25(a)(5). Moreover, as it does not appear that Ms. Mahon is a Nevada licensed attorney, she may not file documents on behalf of Mr. Lund. See NRAP 46(a)(1) (providing that Injo person may practice law before the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals who is not an active member of the State Bar of Nevada except as provided by SCR 42 and subject to Rule 46(a)(3)"). Accordingly, the clerk shall strike the opening brief filed on June 2, 2020. Appellants shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that is signed by both appellants, complies with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NR.AP 32, and contains a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. Failure to &OVUM Court OP PPev&DP
(o) 1PP10, Alpo
- 4.10 -.255/0 comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Appellants may not file an appendix or exhibits. 2 NRAP 30(i). It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
cc: Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas
'Given this order, this court takes no action on respondent's July 1, 2020, objection. Respondent may renew the objection at a later date, if deemed warranted. SuPoem Cocoa OF
EvADA
(0) 1047A 2 ;•`...:•••••S,' 41 ":•".• . 7.3.1,;174.%•1.4 • .1,4„S-:, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE CLERK
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A MEG Supreme Court No. 80229 MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, District Court Case No. A776665 Appellants, vs. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY BUYERS, LLC, Res ondents.
NOTICE OF REJECTION OF DEFICIENT BRIEF
TO: Margaret Mary Mahon
The brief you filed is being rejected for the following reason(s):
Disclosure statement is required. NRAP 26.1
Routing statement is required. NRAP 28(a)(5)
Brief is not double-spaced. NRAP 32(a)(4)
Pages are not properly numbered. NRAP 32(a)(4)
Footnotes are not in the same size and typeface as the body of the brief. NRAP 32(a)(5)
Certificate of compliance is required. NRAP 32(a)(9).
Please correct the deficiencies and return the brief to this office for filing within 5 days of the date of this notice.
DATE: July 20, 2020
Elizabeth A. Brown, Clerk of Court
By: Sandy Young Deputy Clerk
20-26401 Notification List Electronic Law Office of Hayes & Welsh \Martin L. Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas1Will A. Lemkul
Paper Margaret Mary Mahon Christopher John Lund The Watkins Firm, APC \Daniel W. Watkins
20-26401 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, vs. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A FILED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY BUYERS, LLC, Res o ondents.
ORDER TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
On July 10, 2020, this court struck appellants pro se opening brief and directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that is signed by both appellants, complies with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contains a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, that document was rejected by the clerk of this court because it did not comply with this courtis rules. The clerk directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit the brief for filing by July 27, 2020. To date, appellants have not complied or otherwise communicated with this court. Appellants shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP
Summate Colon OF NEVADA
in) 11.117A .1116010 7-0 - 31294 %A.G.; .4-01,14"r" • 32. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. It is so ORDERED,
piedia4 , C.J.
cc: Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan LemkulfLas Vegas
2 Pt •••••• • • A.P•i'd IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, AfK/A No.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, vs. FP ED EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A NOV 0 9 2020 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A. P.:1:".rfiN DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY COIF"
BUYERS, LLC, i-nr CLci Res s ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge. On July 10, 2020, this court entered an order striking the opening brief. This court directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that was signed by both appellants, complied with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contained a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. Appellants were cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal. On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, the clerk of this court issued a notice rejecting that brief because it did not comply with this court's rules.2 The notice directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit their opening brief within 5 days.
IA copy of this order is attached.
2A copy of this notice is attached. Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, on August 25, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, by September 1, 2020, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32.3 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Thus, on September 17, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, within 7 days, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32.4 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. To date, appellants have not resubmitted an opening brief or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellants have abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Stiglich Silver
3A copy of this order is attached.
4A copy of this order is attached. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A <1414. 2 cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/KJA No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, V S. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A FILED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, JUL I 0 2E1 DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY ELIZABETH A. BROWN BUYERS, LLC, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SY S Res ondent. Cr= DEPUT l lt
ORDER STRIKING OPENING BRIEF
Appellant Margaret Mary Mahon filed an opening brief on June 2, 2020, purportedly on behalf of herself and appellant Christopher Lund. The brief does not comply with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32 and is not signed by Ms. Mahon, see NRAP 25(a)(5). Moreover, as it does not appear that Ms. Mahon is a Nevada licensed attorney, she may not file documents on behalf of Mr. Lund. See NRAP 46(a)(1) (providing that Injo person may practice law before the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals who is not an active member of the State Bar of Nevada except as provided by SCR 42 and subject to Rule 46(a)(3)"). Accordingly, the clerk shall strike the opening brief filed on June 2, 2020. Appellants shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that is signed by both appellants, complies with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NR.AP 32, and contains a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. Failure to &OVUM Court OP PPev&DP
(o) 1PP10, Alpo
- 4.10 -.255/0 comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Appellants may not file an appendix or exhibits. 2 NRAP 30(i). It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
cc: Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas
'Given this order, this court takes no action on respondent's July 1, 2020, objection. Respondent may renew the objection at a later date, if deemed warranted. SuPoem Cocoa OF
EvADA
(0) 1047A 2 ;•`...:•••••S,' 41 ":•".• . 7.3.1,;174.%•1.4 • .1,4„S-:, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE CLERK
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A MEG Supreme Court No. 80229 MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, District Court Case No. A776665 Appellants, vs. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY BUYERS, LLC, Res ondents.
NOTICE OF REJECTION OF DEFICIENT BRIEF
TO: Margaret Mary Mahon
The brief you filed is being rejected for the following reason(s):
Disclosure statement is required. NRAP 26.1
Routing statement is required. NRAP 28(a)(5)
Brief is not double-spaced. NRAP 32(a)(4)
Pages are not properly numbered. NRAP 32(a)(4)
Footnotes are not in the same size and typeface as the body of the brief. NRAP 32(a)(5)
Certificate of compliance is required. NRAP 32(a)(9).
Please correct the deficiencies and return the brief to this office for filing within 5 days of the date of this notice.
DATE: July 20, 2020
Elizabeth A. Brown, Clerk of Court
By: Sandy Young Deputy Clerk
20-26401 Notification List Electronic Law Office of Hayes & Welsh \Martin L. Welsh Morris Sullivan Lemkul/Las Vegas1Will A. Lemkul
Paper Margaret Mary Mahon Christopher John Lund The Watkins Firm, APC \Daniel W. Watkins
20-26401 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, A/K/A No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, vs. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A FILED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY BUYERS, LLC, Res o ondents.
ORDER TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
On July 10, 2020, this court struck appellants pro se opening brief and directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that is signed by both appellants, complies with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contains a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, that document was rejected by the clerk of this court because it did not comply with this courtis rules. The clerk directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit the brief for filing by July 27, 2020. To date, appellants have not complied or otherwise communicated with this court. Appellants shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP
Summate Colon OF NEVADA
in) 11.117A .1116010 7-0 - 31294 %A.G.; .4-01,14"r" • 32. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. It is so ORDERED,
piedia4 , C.J.
cc: Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan LemkulfLas Vegas
2 Pt •••••• • • A.P•i'd IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET MARY MAHON, AfK/A No. 80229 MEG MAHON; AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN LUND, Appellants, vs. FILED EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, A SEP 1 7 2020 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ELIZABETh A. BROWN DERIVATIVELY BY PROPERTY CLERK 40 *NM& COURT BUYERS, LLC, aY D' DEPUTYnRK1643-.- Ci Res • ondents.
On July 10, 2020, this court struck appellants pro se opening brief and directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that is signed by both appellants, complies with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contains a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, that document was rejected by the clerk of this court because it did not comply with this court's rules. The clerk directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit the brief for filing by July 27, 2020. When appellants did not timely comply or otherwise communicate with this court, on August 25, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, by September 1, 2020, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32. This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. To date, appellants have failed to comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Swoon Cam or Nrwaar
,(1) %CFA 41110. .20 -1‘12A17 Appellants shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. It is so ORDERED.
' f Pickutu , C.J.
cc: Christopher John Lund Margaret Mary Mahon The Watkins Firm, APC Law Office of Hayes & Welsh Morris Sullivan LemkuliLas Vegas
SUPREMA Court OP NEVADA
V I *OA Vellis 2 1.1k."-tj:t. Pi.iF.•I1