Mahon v. Sewell

New York Court of Common Pleas

Mahon v. Sewell

7 N.Y.S. 600, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 816, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190

DecidedDecember 2, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 600 (Mahon v. Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahon v. Sewell, 7 N.Y.S. 600, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 816, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Daly, J.

The appellant does not bring himself within the rule for granting rearguments as laid down by the court. Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. He does not show that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked by the court, nor that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the court. This is an application to re-argue the case upon the points and authorities upon which it has been already heard and disposed of. The application should be denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly, J.

The appellant does not bring himself within the rule for granting rearguments as laid down by the court. Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. He does not show that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked by the court, nor that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the court. This is an application to re-argue the case upon the points and authorities upon which it has been already heard and disposed of. The application should be denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.Y.S. 600, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 816, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahon-v-sewell-nyctcompl-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack