Mahnke v. Rice

703 So. 2d 1235, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 152, 1998 WL 4417
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1998·No. No. 96-3197·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final order entered by the trial court denying the appellant’s motion to modify a final judgment of dissolution. A majority of the panel agrees that Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993) controls this case. A majority also agrees that a new hearing must be held. The cause is remanded for a new hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, J., concurs specially with opinion. HARRIS, J., concurs specially with opinion. THOMPSON, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahnke v. Rice, 703 So. 2d 1235, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 152, 1998 WL 4417 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

703 So. 2d 1235 (Mahnke v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catron v. Catron
708 So. 2d 1022 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)