MAHMOODI v. Hines

278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 17, 2009
DocketED 91129
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.3d 245 (MAHMOODI v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MAHMOODI v. Hines, 278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff homeowner, Hamid Mah-moodi, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Saint Louis County entered in favor of his neighbor, the defendant William Hines, following a trial de novo. The homeowner sued the defendant for damage to the homeowner’s fence that occurred when a tree from the neighboring property fell on it. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnston v. State
278 S.W.3d 245 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahmoodi-v-hines-moctapp-2009.