MAHMOODI v. Hines
This text of 278 S.W.3d 245 (MAHMOODI v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The plaintiff homeowner, Hamid Mah-moodi, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Saint Louis County entered in favor of his neighbor, the defendant William Hines, following a trial de novo. The homeowner sued the defendant for damage to the homeowner’s fence that occurred when a tree from the neighboring property fell on it. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahmoodi-v-hines-moctapp-2009.