MAHMOODI v. Hines

278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2009·No. ED 91129·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff homeowner, Hamid Mah-moodi, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Saint Louis County entered in favor of his neighbor, the defendant William Hines, following a trial de novo. The homeowner sued the defendant for damage to the homeowner’s fence that occurred when a tree from the neighboring property fell on it. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAHMOODI v. Hines, 278 S.W.3d 245, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2009 WL 685330 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

278 S.W.3d 245 (MAHMOODI v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnston v. State
278 S.W.3d 245 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)