Mahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
This text of 258 A.2d 705 (Mahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).
Mr. Robert L. Garibaldi argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal NONE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.2d 705, 55 N.J. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahler-v-board-of-adjustment-of-borough-of-fair-lawn-nj-1969.