Mahjor v. Peterson

Fourth Circuit

Mahjor v. Peterson

511 F. App'x 270

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. 13-1043·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hamid R. Mahjor appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil complaint against Deputy Commonwealth Attorney James D. Peterson. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mahjor v. Peterson, No. l:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Hamid R. Mahjor appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his civil complaint against Deputy Commonwealth Attorney James D. Peterson. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mahjor v. Peterson, No. l:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mahjor v. Peterson, 511 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

511 F. App'x 270 (Mahjor v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.