Mahique v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mahique v. State

735 So. 2d 602, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9091, 1999 WL 454496

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1999

DocketNo. 99-346

StatusPublished

This text of 735 So. 2d 602 (Mahique v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahique v. State, 735 So. 2d 602, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9091, 1999 WL 454496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger, 636 So.2d 1321, 1324-25 (Fla.1994) (holding that to set aside conviction on the basis of newly-discovered evidence, “it must appear that defendant or his counsel could not have known them [asserted facts] by the use of diligence.”); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that defendant abuses the judicial process by filing successive motions “that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions”; and warning defendant that “a prisoner who is [603]*603found by a court to have brought a frivolous suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal in any court is subject to having his or her gain time forfeited.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger, 636 So.2d 1321, 1324-25 (Fla.1994) (holding that to set aside conviction on the basis of newly-discovered evidence, “it must appear that defendant or his counsel could not have known them [asserted facts] by the use of diligence.”); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that defendant abuses the judicial process by filing successive motions “that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions”; and warning defendant that “a prisoner who is [603]*603found by a court to have brought a frivolous suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal in any court is subject to having his or her gain time forfeited.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 So. 2d 602, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9091, 1999 WL 454496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahique-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack