Maher's Appeal

4 A. 184, 2 Sadler 261, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 727

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The appellant had his day in court in the judgment which he now seeks to attack the validity of on this bill in equity. If he omitted to make his proper defense there, through negligence or lack of prompt diligence, he cannot make it in this proceeding.

A judgment between the same parties on the same subject-matter must be deemed to be the end of that contention. It should not be renewed for anything shown here.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.