Maher v. Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maher v. Rowland

170 A.D. 913, 154 N.Y.S. 1132

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

We think that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case. The evidence, however, is too indefinite to sustain the award of damages. J udgment dismissing the complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Order modified in accordance with these views, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Rich.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case. The evidence, however, is too indefinite to sustain the award of damages. J udgment dismissing the complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Order modified in accordance with these views, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Rich.

Maher v. Rowland, 170 A.D. 913, 154 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

170 A.D. 913 (Maher v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.