Maher v. Rowland
This text of 170 A.D. 913 (Maher v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case. The evidence, however, is too indefinite to sustain the award of damages. J udgment dismissing the complaint reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Order modified in accordance with these views, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Rich.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 913, 154 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maher-v-rowland-nyappdiv-1915.