Maher v. Kline

74 So. 2d 696, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1164
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 24, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 So. 2d 696 (Maher v. Kline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maher v. Kline, 74 So. 2d 696, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1164 (Fla. 1954).

Opinion

MATHEWS, Justice.

This case involves the question of usury. The principal contention is that the sum of $1,500, which covered attorneys’ fees, a brokerage commission and other incidental expenses in connection with a loan of $20,-000, was excessive and that the charges made were concealed usurious interest.

There was another issue of a $2,000 bonus which is not involved in this particular question.'

After answer was filed, the Chancellor found that the $1,500 was applied to actual expenses of the loan; such as, abstracting, recording fees, intangible taxes, and the balance for attorneys’ fees and brokerage fees. The lenders received none of the $1,500.

The finding of the Chancellor as set forth in the final decree, that the $1,500 charged the borrowers constituted legitimate expenses of the loan, is presumed to be correct and the burden of showing the incorrectness of such decree was upon the appellants. They have failed to meet this burdem

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, Q. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cutri Enterprises, Inc. v. Pan American Bank of Miami
115 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Shaffran v. Holness
102 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Clay v. Girdner
138 So. 490 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 So. 2d 696, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maher-v-kline-fla-1954.