Mahdavi v. 100 Federal, State, County, and City Officials

Supreme Court

Mahdavi v. 100 Federal, State, County, and City Officials

538 U.S. 996, 123 S. Ct. 1904, 155 L. Ed. 2d 823, 71 U.S.L.W. 3679, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3395

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 2003·No. 02-9193·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.

Mahdavi v. 100 Federal, State, County, and City Officials, 538 U.S. 996, 123 S. Ct. 1904, 155 L. Ed. 2d 823, 71 U.S.L.W. 3679, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3395 (2003).

Pincite

538 U.S. 996 (Mahdavi v. 100 Federal, State, County, and City Officials) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related