Maharaj v. State
956 So. 2d 1263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8289, 2007 WL 1543769
Opinion
We affirm the circuit court’s revocation of probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. The trial court’s oral findings at the violation of probation hearing and the written disposition order satisfied due process requirements. See Lacey v. State, 831 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Drayton v. State, 710 So .2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Singletary v. State, 290 So.2d 116, 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maharaj v. State, 956 So. 2d 1263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8289, 2007 WL 1543769 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
956 So. 2d 1263 (Maharaj v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singletary v. State
290 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Lacey v. State
831 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)