Maharaj v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maharaj v. State

956 So. 2d 1263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8289, 2007 WL 1543769

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 2007

DocketNo. 4D06-2946

StatusPublished

This text of 956 So. 2d 1263 (Maharaj v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maharaj v. State, 956 So. 2d 1263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8289, 2007 WL 1543769 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s revocation of probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. The trial court’s oral findings at the violation of probation hearing and the written disposition order satisfied due process requirements. See Lacey v. State, 831 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Drayton v. State, 710 So .2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Singletary v. State, 290 So.2d 116, 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s revocation of probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. The trial court’s oral findings at the violation of probation hearing and the written disposition order satisfied due process requirements. See Lacey v. State, 831 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Drayton v. State, 710 So .2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Singletary v. State, 290 So.2d 116, 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

956 So. 2d 1263, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8289, 2007 WL 1543769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maharaj-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack