Maharaj v. Gonzales

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA  No. 03-71066 DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos. MAHARAJ, A71-788-923 Petitioners,  A71-788-924 A72-402-323 v. A72-402-324 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General, Respondent. 

VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA  No. 03-73995 DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET Agency Nos. MAHARAJ, A71-788-923 Petitioners,  A71-788-924 A72-402-323 v. A72-402-324 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325 General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed February 6, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by 1585 1586 MAHARAJ v. GONZALES the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.