Mahan v. Reeve

6 Blackf. 215
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Blackford, J.

This is a bill in chancery, filed to obtain-a decree for correcting a certain mistake in the proceedings of a cause on petition for partition of certain real estate. The 'mistake is alleged to consist in describing the land in the notice, petition, order of Court for the sale, and the commissioners report of the sale, as being in section twenty-eight, &o., instead of describing it as being in section twenty-three, &o.

Demurrer to the bill; demurrer overruled; and a decree for the colnplainants.

We think this decree is erroneous. ■ No authority is cited,, and we know of none, that shows a Court of chancery to have jurisdiction in a case like that described in the bill.

Per Curiam.—The decree is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahan v. Reeve, 6 Blackf. 215 (Ind. 1842).

6 Blackf. 215 (Mahan v. Reeve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ault v. Clark
112 N.E. 843 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Lewis v. Owen
64 Ind. 446 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Rogers v. Abbott
37 Ind. 138 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Vogler v. Spaugh
28 F. Cas. 1254 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1869)