Mahan v. Owen
This text of 23 Ark. 347 (Mahan v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Mahan presented to the probate court of White county, for allowance against the estate of John Owen, deceased, a transcript of what purported to be a decree of some court, in favor of Mahan, against Owen, for a sum of money.
Mary A. Owen, the administratrix of John Owen, contested the claim, it was disallowed, and on appeal by Mahan to the circuit court, the judgment of the probate court was affirmed.
It seems that the probate court rejected the demand, because the affidavit was not subscribed by Mahan,, and the transcript was not properly authenticated.
The first objection was not well taken, as held in Gill et al. vs. Ward et al. 22 Ark.
Passing over the informality of the certificate of authentication, attached to the transcript of the decree, in other respects, neither the certificate, the caption, nor the body of the transcript, shows what court rendered the decree.
For this cause the transcript was properly excluded, and the claim disallowed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ark. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahan-v-owen-ark-1861.