Mahan v. Benton

26 La. Ann. 379
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1874
DocketNo. 4943
StatusPublished

This text of 26 La. Ann. 379 (Mahan v. Benton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahan v. Benton, 26 La. Ann. 379 (La. 1874).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss.

Taliaferro, J.

The grounds for the motion are : First — The record has not been filed within the time of extension granted by the court.

Second — Want of jurisdiction, the amount involved being only five hundred dollars.

This case is not distinguishable' from that of Oglesby v. Helm, decided not long sirice by this court. 26 An. .61.

The present case, like that of Oglesby v. Helm, is an injunction suit to restrain proceedings in relation to a sum amounting to just five hundred dollars. It is clear this court has not jurisdiction.

It is ordered therefore that this suit be dismissed at appellant’s costs. ^

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahan-v-benton-la-1874.