Mahalek v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance

205 Ill. App. 334
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,788·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Insurance, § 659*—when evidence is sufficient to show truth of statements in application. Evidence in an action on a life insurance policy, held to warrant finding that the insured's statements in his application for life insurance as to his health were true and not false. 5. Insurance, § 663*—what is not evidence of Knowledge of falsity of statements by insured in application. A coroner’s finding on autopsy that an insured’s death was due to organic heart disease, held not to he evidence tending to prove that the insured consciously departed from .the truth when he represented in his application for life insurance that he did not suffer from heart disease1, in an action to recover on a life insurance policy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahalek v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance, 205 Ill. App. 334 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

205 Ill. App. 334 (Mahalek v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barbour v. Aetna Life Insurance
224 Ill. App. 312 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)