Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness

Ninth Circuit

Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness

389 F.2d 387

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 26, 1968

Docket21302

StatusPublished

This text of 389 F.2d 387 (Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahala Ashley Dickerson v. Richard Gantz, James Delaney, Jr., George Hayes, Robert Erwin, and David Thorsness, 389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.

Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.

We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.

Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.

We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 F.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahala-ashley-dickerson-v-richard-gantz-james-delaney-jr-george-hayes-ca9-1968.