Mahaffey v. Southern Ry. Co.
178 S.E. 838, 175 S.C. 198, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 88
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
For the reasons stated by the Circuit Judge, his order, which will be reported, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahaffey v. Southern Ry. Co., 178 S.E. 838, 175 S.C. 198, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 88 (S.C. 1935).
178 S.E. 838 (Mahaffey v. Southern Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. Atlanta-Charlotte Airline Railway Co.
159 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1968)
Wallace v. Interamerican Trust Co.
144 S.E.2d 813 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)
Nienow v. Nienow
141 S.E.2d 648 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)
Barfield v. Dillon Motor Sales, Inc.
103 S.E.2d 416 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Peagler v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
101 S.E.2d 821 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Jh Ellen, Jr. v. King
88 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Stepp v. HORTON
88 S.E.2d 258 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Royster v. Unity Life Ins. Co.
8 S.E.2d 875 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Biltrite Building Co. v. Adams
7 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Planters Fertilizer & Phosphate Co. v. McCreight
198 S.E. 405 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)