Mahaffey v. Sarshik
137 A. 887, 101 N.J. Eq. 297, 16 Stock. 297, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 577
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — The Cheek-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahaffey v. Sarshik, 137 A. 887, 101 N.J. Eq. 297, 16 Stock. 297, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 577 (N.J. 1927).
137 A. 887 (Mahaffey v. Sarshik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Centex Homes Corp. v. Boag
320 A.2d 194 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Schwartz v. Hoffman Foundation, C., Corp.
51 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)