Magwood v. Haberstadt

Fourth Circuit

Magwood v. Haberstadt

615 F. App'x 125

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2015·No. No. 15-1552·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Magwood appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Magwood v. Haberstadt, No. 2:14-cv-03972-DCN (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[126] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Magwood appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Magwood v. Haberstadt, No. 2:14-cv-03972-DCN (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[126] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Magwood v. Haberstadt, 615 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

615 F. App'x 125 (Magwood v. Haberstadt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.