Magula v. Gossett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Magula v. Gossett

568 So. 2d 1011, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8266, 1990 WL 165018

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1546

StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 1011 (Magula v. Gossett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magula v. Gossett, 568 So. 2d 1011, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8266, 1990 WL 165018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants in a legal malpractice action. We reverse.

After reviewing the complaint and answer, we are of the opinion that, inarticulate though it may be in some places, the complaint did state a cause of action and factual questions remain. Therefore, judgment on the pleadings was inappropriate in this instance. McAbee v. Edwards, 340 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); See also General GMC Truck Sales And Serv. v. Simm, 430 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Riccio v. Stein, 559 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) rev dismissed, 567 So.2d 436 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED.

DELL, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI