Maguire v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maguire v. State

350 So. 2d 349, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15273

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1977

DocketNo. 75-2282

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 349 (Maguire v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maguire v. State, 350 So. 2d 349, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. We have carefully considered and reject the retroactive application of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Roberts v. State, 335 So.2d 285 (Fla.1976), adopting the so called “Lyles” rule. In this regard, we agree with the reasoning and rationale of the Third District in Williams v. State, La.App., 346 So.2d 554, opinion filed February 8, 1977; but see, Ringgo v. State, 339 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. We have carefully considered and reject the retroactive application of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in Roberts v. State, 335 So.2d 285 (Fla.1976), adopting the so called “Lyles” rule. In this regard, we agree with the reasoning and rationale of the Third District in Williams v. State, La.App., 346 So.2d 554, opinion filed February 8, 1977; but see, Ringgo v. State, 339 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 So. 2d 349, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maguire-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack