Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

306 A.D.2d 253, 760 N.Y.S.2d 234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 253 (Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maguire v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc., 306 A.D.2d 253, 760 N.Y.S.2d 234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296 alleging discrimination based on gender, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered May 17, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[254]*254Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant made a prima facie showing that its failure to grant the plaintiff postemployment benefits was not the result of gender discrimination (see Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623 [1997]; Liebowitz v Luitpold Pharms., 288 AD2d 352 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the proffered reasons for the defendant’s actions were pretextual. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Friedmann, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action pursuant to Executive Law § 296 alleging discrimination based on gender, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered May 17, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[254]*254Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant made a prima facie showing that its failure to grant the plaintiff postemployment benefits was not the result of gender discrimination (see Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623 [1997]; Liebowitz v Luitpold Pharms., 288 AD2d 352 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the proffered reasons for the defendant’s actions were pretextual. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Friedmann, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 253, 760 N.Y.S.2d 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maguire-v-quaker-ridge-golf-club-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack