Maguire v. Nestun Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maguire v. Nestun Realty Corp.

1 A.D.2d 688, 148 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3829

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 688 (Maguire v. Nestun Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maguire v. Nestun Realty Corp., 1 A.D.2d 688, 148 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action on behalf of the infant to recover damages for personal injuries and by her father for expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment of the City Court of the City of Hew Rochelle in favor of respondents, after trial before the court without a jury. Respondents’ evidence was that the infant respondent was on the fire escape outside a window of respondents’ apartment for the purpose of gathering clothing from a wash line and was attempting' to open the window in order to re-enter the apartment. For a period of some years, the window had been difficult to open, and there was testimony that it had been painted on the outside by appellant, the owner of the building, shortly before the accident and that that had increased the difficulty. As she applied pressure to lift the window, her knee broke the pane and she sustained cuts on her leg below the knee. Judgment unanimously affirmed," with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on behalf of the infant to recover damages for personal injuries and by her father for expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment of the City Court of the City of Hew Rochelle in favor of respondents, after trial before the court without a jury. Respondents’ evidence was that the infant respondent was on the fire escape outside a window of respondents’ apartment for the purpose of gathering clothing from a wash line and was attempting' to open the window in order to re-enter the apartment. For a period of some years, the window had been difficult to open, and there was testimony that it had been painted on the outside by appellant, the owner of the building, shortly before the accident and that that had increased the difficulty. As she applied pressure to lift the window, her knee broke the pane and she sustained cuts on her leg below the knee. Judgment unanimously affirmed," with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 688, 148 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maguire-v-nestun-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1955.