Magruder v. Palmer

69 So. 498, 109 Miss. 516
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 So. 498 (Magruder v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magruder v. Palmer, 69 So. 498, 109 Miss. 516 (Mich. 1915).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The rule which forbids the varying of written instruments by parol evidence applies only to the parties to the writing. Whitney v. Cowan, 55 Miss. 626. Con[521]*521seqnently the court below committed no error in admitting evidence to prove that, in addition to the consideration expressed in the written contract of sale by Bixler to Lander & Ferrell of his stock in the Hattiesburg News Publishing Company, Lander & Ferrell also agreed verbally, as a part of the consideration for this sale, to assume the debts due by the corporation.

The introduction by appellee of evidence that a part of the consideration of this sale was the assumption by Lander & Ferrell of debts due by the Hattiesburg News Publishing Company necessarily made competent that portion of the testimony of H. A. Camp, a witness for appellant, to the effect that Lander & Ferrell not only did not assume these debts, but, on the contrary, expressly declined so to do, and for the error in excluding it the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vance v. Hervey
179 So. 2d 1 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Crosby v. Keen
28 So. 2d 322 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 So. 498, 109 Miss. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magruder-v-palmer-miss-1915.