Magowan v. Stevenson
36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 408, 29 Vroom 408, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 2
Opinion
The opinion below is affirmed, for the reasons given by'the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mague, Van Syckel, Brown, Krueger, Smith, Talman. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magowan v. Stevenson, 36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 408, 29 Vroom 408, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 2 (N.J. 1895).
36 A. 1128 (Magowan v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.