Magoun v. New England Glass Co.

16 F. Cas. 483, 3 Ban. & A. 114
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 F. Cas. 483 (Magoun v. New England Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magoun v. New England Glass Co., 16 F. Cas. 483, 3 Ban. & A. 114 (circtdma 1877).

Opinion

SHEPLEY, Circuit Judge.

The defendants are not proved to have used any moulds of the construction set forth in complainant’s patent, No. 68,633, except such as were constructed and used with the knowledge of the complainant, and with his consent, and were constructed by the complainant or under his direction, and put into defendant’s factories and used under his direction before and up to the date of his application for the patent. Such construction of the moulds at defendant’s expense while complainant was in their employment, operates as a special license to continue to use those specific moulds. No infringement being proved, the bill is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. American Circular Loom Co.
187 F. 840 (First Circuit, 1911)
American Tube-Works v. Bridgewater Iron Co.
26 F. 334 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 483, 3 Ban. & A. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magoun-v-new-england-glass-co-circtdma-1877.