Magnussen v. Shortt
49 A. 783, 200 Pa. 257, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 478
Opinion
In this case a verdict was rendered for the defendants by direction of the court below, and the plaintiff appealed to this court. An examination of the assignments satisfied us that no error was committed by the court below in directing the jury to render a verdict for the defendants. The assignments are dismissed and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magnussen v. Shortt, 49 A. 783, 200 Pa. 257, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 478 (Pa. 1901).
49 A. 783 (Magnussen v. Shortt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gallucci v. Phillips & Jacobs Inc.
13 Pa. D. & C.4th 413 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
Hradil v. Tate
79 Pa. D. & C. 247 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Zettlemoyer v. Leeser
70 Pa. D. & C. 376 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)