Magnuson v. RAMAGE, ANC

351 S.W.3d 676, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 634

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Home Assurance Company (hereinafter, “Insurer”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Cynthia Magnuson, et al, (hereinafter, “Magnu-son”) ordering it to pay its policy limits and prejudgment interest in a garnishment action. Insurer raises four points on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript, and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).