Magnuson v. Public Utilities Commission

150 N.E. 755, 113 Ohio St. 709, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 709, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 207
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1925·No. 19196·Published

Opinion

The evidence in the recdrd is ample to warrant the conclusion of the commission that the plaintiff .in error was not in good faith operating a blis line over the route in question oh April 28; 1923. ■ The findings of fact by the commission are therefore reasonably supported by the evidence adduced at the hearing and consequently its order is neither unlawful nor unreasonable.

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court, that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission of Ohio he, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magnuson v. Public Utilities Commission, 150 N.E. 755, 113 Ohio St. 709, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 709, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 207 (Ohio 1925).

150 N.E. 755 (Magnuson v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.