Magnus v. . Royal Jewelry Manufacturing Company
126 N.E. 914, 228 N.Y. 545, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1002
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magnus v. . Royal Jewelry Manufacturing Company, 126 N.E. 914, 228 N.Y. 545, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1002 (N.Y. 1920).
126 N.E. 914 (Magnus v. . Royal Jewelry Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.