Magnus v. New
212 A.D. 878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Magnus v. New. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D. 123 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1925·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, but without prejudice to a renewal of the motion as to one or both causes of action after the complaint has been amended as directed, and after service of answer. See opinion in Magnus v. New (ante, p. 123), decided herewith. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magnus v. New, 212 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
212 A.D. 878 (Magnus v. New) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.