Magnotta v. Parkway Fleetwood Building, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 896

This text of 277 A.D.2d 896 (Magnotta v. Parkway Fleetwood Building, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magnotta v. Parkway Fleetwood Building, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment and for injunctive relief, defendant appeals from an order which denies its cross motion, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. An action for declaratory judgment may not be entertained where the relief sought (if the grounds therefor, legal or equitable, have merit) may be had in a pending action by way of defense. (Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 N. Y. 304, 311; Civ. Prae. Act, § 1425.) The County Court of Westchester County has jurisdiction of an equitable defense to a summary proceeding. (Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 69, 1425; Matter of Mawson V. Wermuth, 182 N. Y. 234; Goldsmith v. Deitchman, 69 N. Y. S. 2d 148; Zunel v. Kureh, 190 N. Y. S. 642.) The appellant has made a [897]*897stipulation in conformity with the foregoing. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mawson v. . Wermuth
74 N.E. 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)
Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.
5 N.E.2d 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magnotta-v-parkway-fleetwood-building-inc-nyappdiv-1950.