Magnotta v. Magnotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Magnotta v. Magnotta

239 A.D.2d 320, 657 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 320 (Magnotta v. Magnotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magnotta v. Magnotta, 239 A.D.2d 320, 657 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.H.O.), dated February 20, 1996, as, after a nonjury trial, (1) awarded the defendant wife a 50% interest in the marital residence and a 25% interest in the remaining marital assets, and (2) failed to award him an equitable share of the defendant wife’s personal injury award.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court’s equitable distribution of the marital property was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [1]-[10]). Contrary to the husband’s contention, he is not entitled to an equitable share of the wife’s personal injury award (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [2]).

The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.H.O.), dated February 20, 1996, as, after a nonjury trial, (1) awarded the defendant wife a 50% interest in the marital residence and a 25% interest in the remaining marital assets, and (2) failed to award him an equitable share of the defendant wife’s personal injury award.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court’s equitable distribution of the marital property was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [1]-[10]). Contrary to the husband’s contention, he is not entitled to an equitable share of the wife’s personal injury award (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [2]).

The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D.2d 320, 657 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magnotta-v-magnotta-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack