Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ary

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ary

1932 OK 608, 14 P.2d 385, 159 Okla. 73, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 558

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1932

Docket23407

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1932 OK 608 (Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ary, 1932 OK 608, 14 P.2d 385, 159 Okla. 73, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 558 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made oil. February 5, 1982. The Commission entered its order and award allowing the respondent 62% weeks’ compensation for ten per cent, permanent disability for each foot and five per cent, permanent disability of left arm. The only contention of petitioner is that the compensation made by the Industrial Commlission is erroneous in that the Commission erred in computing the disability as to the specific members and basing the same on 500 weeks. The award as made by tbe Commission is proper. See Dolese Bros. Co. v. Roberts, 155 Okla. 198, 8 P. (2d.) 756.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK. V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWIN-DALL, ANDREWS, and KORNBGAY, JJ., concur.

Note.—See under (1) annotation, in L. R A. 1916A, 257; 28 R. C. L. 820, 821.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNEILL, J.

This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made oil. February 5, 1982. The Commission entered its order and award allowing the respondent 62% weeks’ compensation for ten per cent, permanent disability for each foot and five per cent, permanent disability of left arm. The only contention of petitioner is that the compensation made by the Industrial Commlission is erroneous in that the Commission erred in computing the disability as to the specific members and basing the same on 500 weeks. The award as made by tbe Commission is proper. See Dolese Bros. Co. v. Roberts, 155 Okla. 198, 8 P. (2d.) 756.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK. V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWIN-DALL, ANDREWS, and KORNBGAY, JJ., concur.

Note.—See under (1) annotation, in L. R A. 1916A, 257; 28 R. C. L. 820, 821.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 608, 14 P.2d 385, 159 Okla. 73, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magnolia-petroleum-co-v-ary-okla-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack