Magnolia Liquor Co. v. United States
This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 388 (Magnolia Liquor Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[389]*389Opinion by
At the trial the customs inspector who examined the shipment at the time of unlading testified that there was a shortage of eight eases which were not received with the shipment. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon the eight oases of brandy reported as short at the time the shipment was discharged from the vessel. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Cust. Ct. 388, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magnolia-liquor-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.