Magnetic Imaging Systems I, Ltd. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

775 So. 2d 348, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13213, 2000 WL 1506956
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2000·No. Nos. 3D00-1581, 3D00-2318·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioners are medical providers who sued automobile insurers to recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits on behalf of PIP claimants. The respective trial courts granted the respondents’ motions to stay and compel arbitration pursuant to section 627.736(5), Florida Statutes, and denied the petitioners’ subse[349]*349quent motions for reconsideration. The petitioners seek certiorari review of those orders.

We grant certiorari and quash the orders below on the authority of Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc., 758 So.2d 55, 59 (Fla.2000)(holding the mandatory arbitration provision in section 627.736(5) unconstitutional as it denies medical providers access to courts).

Certiorari granted; orders quashed; remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magnetic Imaging Systems I, Ltd. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 775 So. 2d 348, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13213, 2000 WL 1506956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

775 So. 2d 348 (Magnetic Imaging Systems I, Ltd. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consortium for Diagnostics, Inc. v. Cigna Ins. Co.
781 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)