Magnan v. Supermarkets General Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Magnan v. Supermarkets General Corp.

49 A.D.2d 910, 373 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 910 (Magnan v. Supermarkets General Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magnan v. Supermarkets General Corp., 49 A.D.2d 910, 373 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 13, 1974, which is in favor of defendant upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the entire case at a jury trial. The judgment also recites that the third-party complaint is dismissed. Judgment reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, and new trial granted as to all parties and causes, with costs to [911]*911abide the event. No questions of fact were considered or reached on this appeal. The issue of constructive notice was a question of fact for the jury. Under the circumstances, it was error for the Trial Justice to dismiss the complaint at the close of the entire case. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 13, 1974, which is in favor of defendant upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the entire case at a jury trial. The judgment also recites that the third-party complaint is dismissed. Judgment reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, and new trial granted as to all parties and causes, with costs to [911]*911abide the event. No questions of fact were considered or reached on this appeal. The issue of constructive notice was a question of fact for the jury. Under the circumstances, it was error for the Trial Justice to dismiss the complaint at the close of the entire case. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 910, 373 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magnan-v-supermarkets-general-corp-nyappdiv-1975.