Maginnis v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maginnis v. McDonough

925 So. 2d 451, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5062, 2006 WL 1026951

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 2006

DocketNo. 1D04-3691

StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 451 (Maginnis v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maginnis v. McDonough, 925 So. 2d 451, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5062, 2006 WL 1026951 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s concession of error, the circuit court’s order transferring appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to the circuit court to proceed to a disposition on the merits of the petition. See Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ERVIN, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s concession of error, the circuit court’s order transferring appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to the circuit court to proceed to a disposition on the merits of the petition. See Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ERVIN, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 So. 2d 451, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5062, 2006 WL 1026951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maginnis-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack