Maginn v. Deane
This text of Maginn v. Deane (Maginn v. Deane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ROBERT A. MAGINN, JR., § § No. 288, 2024 Appellant-Defendant, § and § Court Below—Court of § Chancery of the NEW MEDIA INVESTORS II-C, LLC, § State of Delaware, § Nominal Defendant, § C.A. No. 2017-0346 v. § § EDWARD DEANE, GEORGE WIHBEY, § and JASON CUNNINGHAM IN HIS § CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT § FOR WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, for § themselves and in the right and for the § benefit of New Media Investors II-B, LLC, § and New Media II-B, LLC § § Plaintiffs-Appellees. §
Submitted: January 29, 2025 Decided: January 31, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting Court en Banc.
ORDER
Now this 31st day of January 2025, the Court having considered this matter on
the briefs and oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having
concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons
assigned by the Court of Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion dated November 1,
2022 and its Final Order and Judgment dated July 17, 2024, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maginn v. Deane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maginn-v-deane-del-2025.