Magin v. Aman

283 A.D.2d 1020, 725 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4607

This text of 283 A.D.2d 1020 (Magin v. Aman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magin v. Aman, 283 A.D.2d 1020, 725 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petition to the extent of compelling respondent father to contribute $5,000 per year toward the college expenses of the parties’ eldest child. In their separation agreement, the parties expressly agreed to contribute to the cost of their children’s college educations in accordance with their respective abilities to pay. The separation agreement set forth no limitations concerning the type of college that the children could attend, the annual expenses that could be incurred by the children, or the expenses that would be borne by the parties. In light of the parties’ respective circumstances, means and needs, and particularly in light of the great disparity between the parties’ respective incomes, we conclude that it was reasonable and fair for the court to direct respondent to pay [1021]*1021approximately 50% of the eldest child’s net college expenses (cf., Jarrell v Jarrell, 276 AD2d 353, 354; Rocchio v Rocchio, 213 AD2d 535, 536; Cockrell v Cockrell, 172 AD2d 1024; Trautwein v Trautwein, 181 AD2d 1060, 1061-1062; Maroney v Maroney, 173 AD2d 685, 686).

In view of the fact that respondent did not prevail in Family Court or on this appeal, there is no basis, either pursuant to the parties’ separation agreement or Domestic Relations Law § 237, for respondent’s demand in the cross petition for reimbursement of counsel fees (see generally, Millard v Millard, 246 AD2d 349, 350-351; De Gasperis v De Gasperis, 98 AD2d 758). (Appeal from Order of Wayne County Family Court, Parenti, J. — Support.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Gasperis v. De Gasperis
98 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Cockrell v. Cockrell
172 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Maroney v. Maroney
173 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Trautwein v. Trautwein
181 A.D.2d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Rocchio v. Rocchio
213 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Millard v. Millard
246 A.D.2d 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Jarrell v. Jarrell
276 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D.2d 1020, 725 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magin-v-aman-nyappdiv-2001.