Magid v. Brooklyn Women's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Magid v. Brooklyn Women's Hospital

283 A.D. 933, 130 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 933 (Magid v. Brooklyn Women's Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magid v. Brooklyn Women's Hospital, 283 A.D. 933, 130 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. The attorney for the defendant-respondent Savage asks to be relieved from the effect of a statement or stipulation made by him on the argument that he was withdrawing the request in his brief that the order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint be reversed and the complaint dismissed. Application granted and he is relieved of the effect of such statement. No appeal has been taken to this court, however, from the order denying the defendant Savage’s motion to dismiss the complaint and the court will not exercise appellate jurisdiction on a suggestion contained in a brief in the absence of an appeal. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ. [See 284 App. Div. 875.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. The attorney for the defendant-respondent Savage asks to be relieved from the effect of a statement or stipulation made by him on the argument that he was withdrawing the request in his brief that the order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint be reversed and the complaint dismissed. Application granted and he is relieved of the effect of such statement. No appeal has been taken to this court, however, from the order denying the defendant Savage’s motion to dismiss the complaint and the court will not exercise appellate jurisdiction on a suggestion contained in a brief in the absence of an appeal. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ. [See 284 App. Div. 875.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 933, 130 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magid-v-brooklyn-womens-hospital-nyappdiv-1954.