Magical Cruise Co. v. Turk

114 So. 3d 233, 2013 WL 131677, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 11, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-1835
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 So. 3d 233 (Magical Cruise Co. v. Turk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magical Cruise Co. v. Turk, 114 So. 3d 233, 2013 WL 131677, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 467 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Magical Cruise Company Limited d/b/a Disney Cruise Line (“DCL”), seeks a writ of certiorari to quash an order requiring it to turn over work product to plaintiff. Because the trial court made no findings to justify ordering the production of work product, we grant the writ and quash the order. See Dismas Charities, Inc. v. Dabbs, 795 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (granting certiorari and quashing order requiring production of documents, where order failed to make any findings in support of denial of petitioner’s work product objections). As the court did in Dabbs, we remand with instructions to the trial court to reconsider the work product objections and to support any order requiring production of the documents with appropriate findings. Id. at 1039.

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur. PALMER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm v. Knapp
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 233, 2013 WL 131677, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magical-cruise-co-v-turk-fladistctapp-2013.