Magic Oriental Rugs, Inc. v. Komorowski
This text of 618 So. 2d 322 (Magic Oriental Rugs, Inc. v. Komorowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming, without deciding, that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies to the instant case as urged by the plaintiffs Isabel and Walter Komorowski and as found by the trial court below, this doctrine merely raises a permissible, not a compulsory, inference of negligence against the defendant Magic Oriental Rugs, Inc. in the accident sued upon. Accordingly, the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the issue of liability in this negligence action. See, e.g., Marrero v. Goldsmith, 486 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla.1986) (res ipsa loquitur “is a rule of evidence that permits, but does not compel, an inference of negligence under certain circumstances.”); Greyhound Corp. v. Ford, 157 So.2d 427, 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963) (“Res ipsa loquitur raises an inference of negligence not a presumption. The doctrine will support a jury verdict but not a directed verdict_”).
The non-final order under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 So. 2d 322, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5221, 1993 WL 152191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magic-oriental-rugs-inc-v-komorowski-fladistctapp-1993.